S1#4 Die transformative Wirkung von KI (zu Gast Charlie Beckett/ KI-Experte UK)
Shownotes
In der aktuellen Folge des Innovation Minutes-Podcasts steht das Thema "Die Macht der KI im Journalismus" im Fokus. Gastgeberin Sabrina Harper spricht mit Professor Charlie Beckett, dem Gründungsdirektor von Polis an der London School of Economics. In einer fesselnden Diskussion wird beleuchtet, wie Künstliche Intelligenz die Medienlandschaft verändert und wie diese Veränderungen strategisch angegangen werden können.
"It´s time for human journalism"
Das Gespräch berichtet über Prof. Becketts Ansicht, dass der Begriff "KI" lediglich technisch ist. Dabei unterstreicht er seine bodenständige Perspektive auf das Thema. Prof. Beckett prognostiziert die transformative Wirkung von KI auf die Medienbranche und zieht Parallelen zur Entwicklung journalistischer Fähigkeiten vor einem Jahrzehnt. Er hebt hervor, dass multidisziplinäre Teams aus Entwickler:innen, Technikexpert:innen und Journalist:innen unerlässlich sind, um die Komplexität der KI zu bewältigen.
Mehr über Prof. Charlie Beckett erfährst du unter: https://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/people/academic-staff/charlie-beckett
Das Interview ist auf Englisch im Originalton zu hören.
Hast du auch spannende Innovationen oder medienbezogene Ideen? Dann besuche uns auf https://www.media-lab.de/de/ und teile sie mit uns!
Transkript anzeigen
00:00:00: Ich denke, das ist ein wichtiges Moment,
00:00:02: nicht nur wegen des Geschäftsmodells,
00:00:05: sondern auch generell, was für Journalismus ist.
00:00:08: Ich denke, es ist über zwei Dinge.
00:00:10: Es ist um diese Technik zu benutzen,
00:00:12: um effizienter, effektiv, mehr akkulär zu sein.
00:00:15: Aber auch um zu denken,
00:00:17: vielleicht müssen wir mehr um die Menschenjournalisten machen.
00:00:20: Echte Insights aus der Medienbranche.
00:00:23: Hier sind deine Innovation-Manage.
00:00:25: Direkt aus dem Mediale Bayern.
00:00:28: Hey, schön, dass du dir Zeit nimmst und der Innovationraum gibst.
00:00:31: Mein Name ist Sabrina Harper.
00:00:33: Und heute habe ich, wie du schon im Intro gehört hast,
00:00:36: ein englischen Talk-Gast bei mir.
00:00:38: Ich habe ChatGPT gefragt, wer er ist.
00:00:41: Und das ist die Antwort.
00:00:43: Er ist Gründungsdirektor von POLLIS,
00:00:45: einem Think Tank für Forschung und Debatte
00:00:48: über internationalen Journalismus und Gesellschaft
00:00:51: in der Abteilung für Medien und Kommunikation
00:00:54: der London School of Economics.
00:00:56: Und forscht unter anderem zu dem Thema "Künstliche Intelligenz".
00:01:00: Ich mache es ein bisschen kürzer.
00:01:02: Die Rede ist von Professor Charlie Beckett.
00:01:04: Und bei Media Lab Innovation Festival
00:01:06: hat er ein Panel zum Thema KI gehalten.
00:01:09: Danach haben wir uns getroffen
00:01:11: und ich habe ihm dann quasi die Gegenfrage gestellt.
00:01:14: Wer ist ChatGPT?
00:01:16: Hey Charlie, so great to have you on the show.
00:01:21: It's lovely to be here, really is.
00:01:23: You do a lot of research about AI and also about media.
00:01:27: Here in Germany it seemed like the media landscape
00:01:30: was quite surprised about ChatGPT becoming so important, so fast.
00:01:36: Have you been caught by surprise about that too?
00:01:38: I'm very excited about ChatGPT.
00:01:42: Just because my business is media change.
00:01:44: So anything that brings the possibility of change
00:01:47: is always interesting for me.
00:01:49: And I think coming to Germany,
00:01:51: I mean here at the innovation lab, the media lab,
00:01:55: it's just fantastic because you've got a bunch of people
00:01:58: who are really interested in the topic intellectually, if you like.
00:02:02: But they're also trying to do something.
00:02:04: And so we're at the heart of this storm,
00:02:08: if you like, around genitive AI.
00:02:10: We are really in the midst of a huge experiment.
00:02:14: So of course there's a lot of hype and a lot of uncertainty.
00:02:17: And the best thing you can do when that happens
00:02:19: is get together with other people who care about you, know about it,
00:02:23: and share your experiences.
00:02:26: Yeah, but what to do now?
00:02:28: From your perspective,
00:02:29: how should the media landscape react on this?
00:02:32: Or even better, act in a transformative environment like this?
00:02:37: It was a surprise, at least in a sort of marketing way,
00:02:41: that the genius of the ChatGPT is that it's so easy to use.
00:02:48: It's just one line, you put in a prompt, and something happens.
00:02:52: And it is quite kind of magical at a superficial level.
00:02:57: This is so much more accessible than other forms of artificial intelligence.
00:03:02: Machine learning, natural language processing, data analysis, all that stuff.
00:03:07: It was quite actually quite laborious and quite complicated.
00:03:11: And it was in this kind of so-called black box.
00:03:13: It was hard for, if you like, ordinary people or ordinary journalists
00:03:17: who weren't tech clever to play with it or to understand it.
00:03:22: It was left to the tech department.
00:03:25: And I've been working on that for four years,
00:03:27: and I can see how that's had a big impact already on many news organisations.
00:03:32: So when this came along, it was a surprise, because they did rush it out.
00:03:37: It emerged because there's this competition,
00:03:41: there's a race going on between Microsoft and Google in particular.
00:03:45: But the other big tech companies too.
00:03:47: So we're getting to play with this technology before it's properly evolved.
00:03:52: Is it about time to concentrate on new USPs to define journalism?
00:03:59: Yeah, I think it's, we've been through these different waves of change,
00:04:03: you know, going online and then on come social media.
00:04:06: And now these AI-type technologies.
00:04:10: And what's interesting about it is not just that the technologies change
00:04:13: the way you do your journalism.
00:04:15: It also makes you think about what's the point of journalism in the first place.
00:04:18: You know, is the point of journalism to keep big journalism brands profitable?
00:04:25: Or is it perhaps to serve the public and give them information
00:04:31: and to hold power to account, all those other nice public service things
00:04:35: that journalism can do.
00:04:37: And I think we're at another point here where we're thinking,
00:04:40: well, if the AI can do the more routine journalism,
00:04:45: what does that leave us with?
00:04:46: What is it that's special about a news organization?
00:04:51: What can we do as journalists that the algorithms can't?
00:04:56: And so I think this is a really important moment.
00:04:58: We're not just because of the business model,
00:05:02: but just generally, you know, what's journalism for?
00:05:05: And I think it's about, well, it's about two things.
00:05:07: It's about using this tech to be more efficient, more effective,
00:05:11: more accurate, to reach more people in a way that, you know,
00:05:15: gives them the content they want in the right format
00:05:18: and at the right time.
00:05:19: But also it's about thinking, well,
00:05:22: perhaps we ought to be doing more human journalism.
00:05:24: We ought to be doing more reporting, more witnessing,
00:05:27: more mission driven journalism, perhaps.
00:05:30: Journalism that relates much more to human interest, if you like,
00:05:34: but it's a bit more emotional, a bit more engaged.
00:05:38: So I think it's a fascinating time for journalism.
00:05:41: And like today, this event, you've seen some brilliant startups,
00:05:46: which are using the tech to try and do something a bit different.
00:05:51: You did the panel about AI earlier today,
00:05:56: and you said we need to think about something else,
00:05:59: because AI is just a technical term.
00:06:02: What did you exactly mean?
00:06:04: What I mean is, I use the term "artificial intelligence"
00:06:07: because there isn't a better word for it.
00:06:09: And it's really an umbrella term that covers a whole series of technologies
00:06:13: based around this idea that the algorithm can be trained
00:06:18: to predict the next bit of language.
00:06:24: And in some ways, it's very routine.
00:06:26: You know, those big machine learning programs
00:06:29: that scrape the social media, looking for stories,
00:06:32: they're actually quite routine in a way.
00:06:35: With generative AI, it's not like some miracle.
00:06:38: We haven't suddenly got sentient AI.
00:06:41: We haven't suddenly got something that's genuinely intelligent.
00:06:44: But for a number of reasons,
00:06:46: development and software and hardware and servers,
00:06:48: they are much, much, much more effective.
00:06:52: And they are able, as the name says,
00:06:54: to actually generate content incredibly quickly
00:06:58: based on these huge, large language models.
00:07:01: They are definitely not perfect
00:07:02: because they don't know anything.
00:07:04: They are not truth machines.
00:07:06: They are language machines.
00:07:08: They are just like a sort of very enthusiastic
00:07:10: intern who's trying their best to give you what you want.
00:07:14: But they don't actually necessarily know
00:07:18: in a human sense what they're talking about.
00:07:21: Someone said to me that in the future
00:07:23: we will have some kind of magic buttons.
00:07:27: They seem like virtual, or maybe,
00:07:30: even in the real world, buttons.
00:07:32: We push them and the magic happens.
00:07:35: Magic made by AI.
00:07:37: You are really down to earth.
00:07:39: So what do you think about those magic buttons?
00:07:41: Is it fancy stuff?
00:07:43: As I said, the point of chat, GBT,
00:07:45: was that it was so easy to use.
00:07:46: You don't want to know all the tech details
00:07:50: if you're using this thing, even if you're a journalist.
00:07:53: You just want to be able to use it and trust it
00:07:56: and find it efficient and helpful.
00:07:59: It's the same with driving a car.
00:08:01: You have to learn how to drive a car.
00:08:03: You don't have to learn how to rebuild the engine.
00:08:05: You don't even have to know particularly how the engine works.
00:08:09: You just have to know where you're driving to
00:08:11: and to know that you're going to be safe in your car.
00:08:14: And I think it's similar to this,
00:08:16: that there's this explosion at the moment
00:08:18: of people coming up with special apps
00:08:20: that are using chat, GBT,
00:08:23: they're using generative AI.
00:08:25: Some of them aren't, to be honest.
00:08:28: And many of them are very simple use cases
00:08:31: that will probably disappear, like autumn leaves.
00:08:34: But there is so much happening, so much creativity.
00:08:39: And there's such a potential there at least,
00:08:43: that okay, you may not rush to build your news from around tomorrow.
00:08:51: But I've got no doubt
00:08:53: out personally that it's going to shape the way the information flows in the future.
00:08:59: And one of the key things is to do what journalism has always done, which is to make it easier
00:09:04: for people to get information.
00:09:06: So getting back to the roots.
00:09:08: Getting back to roots, getting back to basics.
00:09:11: If technology is super complicated to use, people won't use it.
00:09:15: It's as simple as that.
00:09:16: So something that a tech expert finds deeply fascinating and intriguing as a use case.
00:09:23: Is useless unless it's easily used.
00:09:27: And that's whether it's used by journalists or whether it's used by a member of the public.
00:09:32: So the real goal dust, if you like, is making this stuff reliable, trustworthy and easy to use.
00:09:42: Thank God there's hype.
00:09:43: That's what you said.
00:09:45: That's your sentence.
00:09:46: You as an expert, what do you think?
00:09:49: What is the next big thing to influence the media industry in the near future?
00:09:54: Well, I think the whole genitive AI thing is going to be absolutely fascinating.
00:09:59: And I don't think it's going to slow down much.
00:10:01: I mean, I like the hype in the sense that it's like an alarm bell going off.
00:10:06: And it's provoked this fantastic debate, which is much broader than perhaps even the debate
00:10:11: we had over social media.
00:10:13: And I think that's really interesting.
00:10:15: It's got politicians engaged.
00:10:18: It's got regulators engaged.
00:10:20: It's got university professors engaged.
00:10:23: People paying attention to it.
00:10:25: Editors are paying attention to it.
00:10:28: And I think that is good because I think there are kind of short term effects that are going to happen.
00:10:35: You know, that people are going to use new tools, perhaps we'll come up with new formats
00:10:38: and new kind of ways of servicing the public.
00:10:41: But in the longer term, there is also the bigger issues around, for example,
00:10:47: the quality of information in our societies, but also from an industry point of view,
00:10:52: what is going to be the structure of a newsroom or the structure of the news industry
00:10:58: in say five to 10 years time?
00:11:00: Because we saw how people predicted that social media or the internet would kill off
00:11:06: all mainstream media.
00:11:07: Well, it hasn't.
00:11:08: If you look around Germany, there's some very familiar, very old brands
00:11:12: were still going strong, in fact, stronger than ever, more red than ever before,
00:11:18: as still very influential.
00:11:21: So I'm not suggesting that this is going to kill off mainstream media.
00:11:25: But I think it's changed so much in the last 10, 15 years.
00:11:30: And I suspect that this is another phase of very intense change
00:11:35: because this is opening up the creation of content so, so widely.
00:11:43: And it's going to create, on the more optimistic side,
00:11:46: is an incredible opportunity for creativity.
00:11:50: The machine kind of does a lot on its own, but somebody has to train the algorithm.
00:11:56: Somebody has to check the data set it's based on.
00:12:00: Somebody has to put the prompt in, train, instruct the algorithm,
00:12:07: what you wanted to do.
00:12:08: And somebody has to edit it afterwards as well to make sure that it's what you want.
00:12:15: So the idea that suddenly journalism disappears is a nonsense.
00:12:20: But it does represent a huge shift in power to other people,
00:12:27: just like the internet did, just like digital did,
00:12:30: just like mobile telephony and smartphones,
00:12:33: broaden people's ability.
00:12:36: Anybody who is savvy about using the tech
00:12:39: could at least, in theory, be part of the information ecosystem.
00:12:43: So journalists once again have to think, "What's special about what we do?"
00:12:48: Somehow it reminds me about the shift of skills
00:12:51: that journalists had to learn about 10 or 15 years ago.
00:12:56: Before that, there were video journalists, newspaper journalists or radio journalists.
00:13:01: They all had a specific skill set.
00:13:04: Then when the age of multimedia was coming up,
00:13:09: as a journalist, you needed to be able to do writing,
00:13:13: but also video editing or audio pieces.
00:13:17: Now when I'm thinking about AI, maybe there will be no one man show or one woman show.
00:13:26: But it's kind of similar.
00:13:28: We will need a different skill set.
00:13:30: Maybe that will be a team with developers, tech people and journalists altogether,
00:13:36: or something like that.
00:13:37: What should you think about that stuff?
00:13:38: I mean, one of the things that's come out of our journalism AI project over the last few years
00:13:43: is we've been working with teams of journalists and tech people
00:13:47: from different news organisations collaborating on innovation.
00:13:51: And it's been fascinating.
00:13:52: You can see how the skill set has obviously had to change.
00:13:56: You still have the traditional skills,
00:13:58: perhaps the things that made you into a journalist in the first place,
00:14:02: finding things out, communicating, understanding stuff.
00:14:07: But there's also, obviously, this technology
00:14:12: brings new opportunities to do things in different ways,
00:14:15: to research in different ways and to format content in different ways.
00:14:19: So it's really interesting watching people who often come from a more tech background
00:14:24: getting dragged into journalism because it's really interesting.
00:14:27: Journalism is quite an interesting career to be in.
00:14:30: And likewise, the other way, journalists who think,
00:14:32: "Hey, this stuff is a really good way for me to find out things or to tell a story.
00:14:38: I'm going to find out how to use it."
00:14:40: And that's been the story of the last 20, 30 years.
00:14:42: In some ways, it's really exciting.
00:14:44: When I was a journalist, you were a newspaper journalist or a TV journalist or a radio journalist.
00:14:49: And that was it.
00:14:50: Now, you're expected to have all these many, many different skills.
00:14:54: And that's deeply challenging, partly because you have to work much harder,
00:14:57: as well as train yourself much harder and keep yourself up to date.
00:15:01: And all that time, you're still getting paid really badly.
00:15:04: And everyone hates you.
00:15:07: So I can see there's a real pressure on journalists today.
00:15:10: Many of them will look at this and think, "Oh, gosh, here we go again."
00:15:13: You just want to think, "I've got to cross all this stuff. It's going to change again."
00:15:17: And I think it's a real pressure point.
00:15:19: The stress levels for journalists out there are really high.
00:15:23: And management needs to think hard about how it incorporates some of these technologies,
00:15:28: how it makes sure that its staff are both trained, but also managed well
00:15:34: in a way that doesn't overestimate the ability, the magic of this.
00:15:38: AI is not magic.
00:15:39: It doesn't do things completely on its own.
00:15:42: You don't want it to.
00:15:44: So there's going to be a lot of responsibility for journalists
00:15:47: and a lot of pressure on them, probably, to work harder.
00:15:51: I hope the technology can save them all at a time.
00:15:54: It can mean they don't have to do some of those boring routine things.
00:15:58: And it may mean they're able to do very exciting new things
00:16:01: to help make their work feel more meaningful and effective.
00:16:05: But yeah, it's going to be tough.
00:16:09: But then, gosh, I don't know if there's journalists out there
00:16:12: who isn't having quite a tough time already.
00:16:15: That's true.
00:16:16: Thank you for sharing your insights with us.
00:16:20: I'm going out of the conversation.
00:16:22: And what's left of me is, among other things,
00:16:24: that AI influences the power of power.
00:16:26: Like back then, for example, the phone, the internet
00:16:29: or social media, as Charlie Beckett said.
00:16:32: What does your editorial work look like?
00:16:34: Who has the data?
00:16:35: Who has the technology?
00:16:36: And how do you do that with AI?
00:16:39: If you're interested in technology and media,
00:16:42: I can recommend you the Tech Lab.
00:16:45: Developers and media people will come together
00:16:48: and develop together what the media industry needs.
00:16:51: If you want to know more, just go to media-lab.de
00:16:55: You'll find the Tech Lab.
00:16:57: And we'll hear you in the next episode
00:17:00: with the content creator Tuget Jong.
00:17:03: He specialized in trans people and diversity in the media.
00:17:07: Subscribe to the podcast,
00:17:09: and you won't miss the next episode.
00:17:11: I'm Sabrina Harper.
00:17:13: And I wish you a fantastic day.
00:17:16: These were your Innovation Minutes.
00:17:20: Direct from the Media Lab of Bayern.
00:17:22: If you want more,
00:17:24: visit us at media-lab.de
00:17:26: and start your own project.
00:17:29: Last but not least.
00:17:30: This podcast is possible
00:17:32: because we have great supporters and supporters.
00:17:35: Special thanks to the State Chancellor of Bayern,
00:17:38: the Bavarian National Center for New Media,
00:17:40: the BLM and of course my colleagues in the media.
00:17:45: (upbeat music)
Neuer Kommentar